The Duct Tape Programmer Revisited

Not too long ago, I responded to the reaction that many had to Joel Spolsky’s article “The Duct Tape Programmer”. My belief still remains that people missed the point due to the unfortunate titling (as well as the severe dating of the technologies mentioned). I think it might make the meaning of “duct tape programmer” more apparent to contrast the duct tape programmer with his antithesis: the bright shiny guy. And what better way to do that than with a case study: 3D Realms and Duke Nukem Forever.

Now for those who don’t know, Duke Nukem Forever was originally announced in 1997 as the follow up to wildly successful Duke Nukem 3D. How successful you ask? Duke Nukem 3D was self-published by 3D Realms and sold around 3.5 million copies. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that 3D Realms was sitting on a boatload of money. And therein lies the problem. Because 3D Realms was self financing development of Prey (which finally saw release a few years ago) and Duke Nukem Forever, they had full control over time and budget. 12 years later, 3D Realms threw in the towel and closed their doors.

The tragic thing is that Duke Nuke Forever had been “completed” five times over in those 12 years. Unfortunately just as they should have been marching toward development, George Broussard would see a new “must have” feature for Duke Forever demonstrated in a new engine. Instead of passing on that bright shiny object for this time and pushing on to release, he would have the team rebuild the game on the new engine. There are at least 4 documented instances of this occurring.

And that my friends is the difference between Joel’s Duct Tape Programmer and the Bright Shiny Guy. The duct tape programmer doesn’t give a damn about that new high resolution snowflake modeling, he wants to ship the product so he can start the next version using the high res snowflakes. That is why I wanted to be the Duct Tape Programmer. You go ahead and use products that are barely released on your enterprise critical system. I’ll use the tools that I’m familiar with. You can argue that the new stuff is sexy. What’s really sexy to me is shipping a product.

And in the end that’s what our job really is. Just ask the former developers at 3D Realms.

Published Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:25 AM by Mike Brown

Comments

# re: The Duct Tape Programmer Revisited

<i>What’s really sexy to me is shipping a product. </i>

Amen.

People forget that most programmers and IT guys are employed by companies for whom IT is a staff function.  For us, the product is assembled on the floor, the software is merely a tool _they_ use to get the job done.

The business guys could care less about shiny vs. duct tape.  They care about 'does it work' and 'is it cost effective' and 'how does it help me ship'.

Thursday, January 07, 2010 10:39 AM by Brian Dunbar

# re: The Duct Tape Programmer Revisited

Even when they're employed by software companies, shipping a working product that meets or exceeds market needs is still the most imperative goal.

Friday, January 08, 2010 6:11 AM by Mike Brown

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
(optional)
(required)